Home

About Eamonn Fingleton
Author of In the Jaws of the Dragon; Unsustainable; In Praise of Hard Industries; Blindside; and the Penguin Money Book
Thirty Years of Prescience
A retrospective on Fingleton's record as a commentator
About In the Jaws of the Dragon
A 2008 book in which Fingleton challenges the Washington view that China is converging to Western values
About In Praise of Hard Industries
Published in 1999 and subtitled Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the Key to Future Prosperity, this was Fingleton's challenge to America's exaggerated hopes for the New Economy
About Blindside
Fingleton's controversial 1995 book on why the Japanese economic system is not capitalism -- and how "basket case" Japan secretly seized the lead in advanced manufacturing when Washington wasn't looking
About Unsustainable.org
Named for the headline over an article Fingleton published in the American Prospect in 2000, Unsustainable.org was founded in 2001 as the Internet's first site on America's trade disaster
Amazon.com on Hard Industries
Amazon's business editor named Hard Industries one of the ten best books of 1999
Business Week on Blindside
One of the best books of the year
Finding Fingleton's Books
Navigating Amazon's problematical catalog
中文 [For Chinese Speakers]
冯艾盟先生简介。。。馮艾盟先生簡介
日本語 [For Japanese Speakers]
エーモン・フィングルトン略歴
Links

Archives 2001--2007

A Reviewer Who Has Read the Book

The American radio industry's top liberal talk show host has had some nice things to say about my book on China. That's flattering. What's even more flattering is that he has  read the book. Really read it, that is. EF
 

One of the more discouraging things I have learned in a writing career that now stretches back nearly 40 years is that few people read books. They buy books;  they talk about books; they deck out their living room shelves with books; they like to be photographed with books. But that does not mean they actually read books.
 
In my experience, even book reviewers rarely get much beyond the first chapter. They then move straight to the last few pages of the final chapter before writing a review.  This will consist mainly of a statement of the reviewer's opinions not on the book but rather on the underlying topic that the book addresses. If the reviewer agrees with the author's opinions on this topic (which the author will probably, if he is doing his job, have withheld until the last few pages), this will come through loud and clear. Equally if the reviewer disagrees, this  too will be evident. But the basic point is that the review will be about opinions, those of the author and those of the reviewer, with the latter's holding center-stage.
 
I am of course happy if a reviewer agrees with my opinions but  my objective in writing books is not primarily to express opinions or enter into a debate. Rather it is to convey facts. In the nature of things, the factual meat in a book is not in the first or last chapters but in those in between. It is there that the author has to work hardest and it is there that a book stands or falls in its basic function of advancing knowledge.
 
These points are well understood by Thom Hartmann, the top liberal talk show show and Air America's riposte to Rush Limbaugh. Hartmann recently reviewed In the Jaws of the Dragon and gave it a good grade. What matters particularly to me is that he has evidently read the book cover to cover. That's a rare compliment in an increasingly busy world.

This is his assessment:


"In the Jaws of the Dragon: America's Fate in the Coming Era of Chinese Hegemony is one of the most powerful, shocking, well-written, solidly documented, tear-the-scales-from-your-eyes books I've read in more than two decades...... I couldn't put this book down - at least 100 of its 310 pages are dog-eared and highlighted. It's probably the most important book that's ever been written about the future of our republic."
 
For the full review, click on the link below: